Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 01.07.2025 13:31

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Costco plans new checkout option members should love - TheStreet

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Wall Street floods into Bitcoin Futures as CME trader count hits all-time high - AMBCrypto

What’s next?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Russia can stop this any time.

What is life without a job?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

I’m 17 and looking for a girl. What do I do?

Let’s just make it real clear:

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Thank you.

iOS 26 New iPhone Release: Apple Delivers Unprecedented Update - Forbes

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Rory McIlroy destroys tee marker but survives cut at U.S. Open - NBC Sports

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

What are the best skin care products for girls?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

The world needs the United States, but the USA doesn't need the world. Is this true?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Jason Sudeikis Remembers Uncle George Wendt as “an Incredible Influence” - The Hollywood Reporter